Conroe Judge Awards $1,738,322 in Fatal Pedestrian Accident
A person was walking near their home and was struck by a vehicle after dark. The driver was allegedly on the shoulder without headlights. The collision resulted in fatal injuries. The case involved claims of vehicle negligence and negligent hiring against the driver's employer.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $1,738,322
- County
- Montgomery County, TX
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Accident Type
- Pedestrian
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence, Auto/Pedestrian Collision
Case Overview
A 27-year-old pedestrian sustained fatal injuries after being struck by a vehicle operated by a restaurant employee in Conroe, Texas. The incident occurred after dark as the pedestrian attempted to cross a multi-lane roadway near his residence. The pedestrian was rendered unconscious from massive blunt force trauma and died two days later. The plaintiff, representing the decedent's estate, subsequently filed a motor vehicle negligence lawsuit against the driver and the driver's employer. Prior to trial, the driver settled his personal liability for $30,000, and the case proceeded against the restaurant defendant.
The plaintiff alleged the defendant driver was traveling on the shoulder of the road without activated headlights. Surveillance footage from a nearby gas station captured the incident. The plaintiff argued that the footage, though dark, showed the decedent carrying a white plastic bag visible until the moment of impact, and no headlights were discernible from the striking vehicle. The plaintiff further contended that the driver's credibility was suspect, noting the driver's blood test revealed THC and inconsistent testimony regarding marijuana use. Additionally, the plaintiff asserted the restaurant negligently hired and failed to adequately train the driver.
The defendant driver denied traveling on the shoulder or operating the vehicle without headlights. The restaurant defendant maintained that the plaintiff's claims for lost earning capacity, estimated at approximately $760,000, were unduly speculative, despite testimony that the decedent was pursuing an associate's degree. The decedent had spina bifida, but his mother testified he could walk at a normal pace. The case was tried before the court under COVID-19 protocols. The court found in favor of the plaintiff and entered a final judgment, awarding $1,738,322. The outcome indicated the court accepted the plaintiff's presentation of the incident's circumstances and the defendant's liability.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Montgomery County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed serious injuries to their neck and back, including paralysis in one arm, requiring surgery. The other driver argued that a third vehicle caused the accident or that the injured driver's own actions contributed. The jury found the second driver fully at fault.
One driver was traveling in Montgomery County when her pickup truck was rear-ended by another vehicle in a four-vehicle chain collision. The plaintiffs' vehicle was pushed into the vehicle in front of it. The plaintiffs claimed injuries to their backs and necks. The driver of the rear vehicle contended that the accident started with the plaintiffs hitting the vehicle ahead of them. It was raining at the time of the accident.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.