Burnet County Negligent Auto Repair Fire Injury Settles
One driver was traveling on a highway during a rainstorm when another driver struck their vehicle. The collision caused the vehicle to catch fire, and the occupants sustained severe injuries, including burns and crush injuries. The occupants sued the collision center that had previously repaired the car's roof, alleging negligent repair compromised the vehicle's structural integrity and led to the fire and their injuries. The defense argued the other driver was solely responsible for the accident.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $41,936,423
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Burns / Lacerations
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Contusion, Pulmonary, Burns
Case Overview
On December 21, 2013, two plaintiffs were involved in a collision with another driver on U.S. Route 281 North in Burnet County, Texas. The plaintiffs, driving a Honda Fit sedan, were struck during a rainstorm. Their vehicle subsequently caught fire, and one plaintiff sustained severe burns while trapped inside, along with multiple fractures and other injuries. The second plaintiff suffered various severe crush injuries and internal trauma.
The plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against a collision center, alleging negligent repair of their vehicle. They claimed the collision center, which had replaced the car's roof 13 months prior, used adhesive glue instead of welding it, compromising the vehicle's structural integrity and contributing to the fire and the severity of their injuries. Plaintiffs' accident reconstruction and biomechanical experts testified that the improper repair caused the roof to buckle and separate, leading to structural failures and the fuel tank being struck, which amplified the injuries. The defense denied negligence, asserting that the accident was unavoidable due to the severe rainstorm and the force of the impact would have caused the same injuries regardless of the roof repair method. Defense experts contended that glue was as strong as welds and that the injuries resulted from deceleration, not structural collapse.
The jury found the collision center 75 percent negligent and the non-party driver 25 percent negligent. A total award of $41,936,423 was determined, which was reduced to $31,452,317 due to comparative fault. The case later settled under a confidential high/low agreement.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their car was hit by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back, neck, and shoulder. The passenger in the car also claimed an injury. The case involved an insurance claim after the at-fault driver was uninsured.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.