Verdictly
Verdict-Plaintiff
Dallas County • 2017

Bryan/College Station Jury Awards $2,350 in Rear-End Collision

One driver was stopped at a red light when the vehicle behind them rear-ended them, pushing their car into the vehicle in front. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed neck and back injuries. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being distracted by his cell phone but denied gross negligence. The jury found the defendant negligent but not grossly negligent.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Outcome

Outcome
Verdict-Plaintiff
Amount
$2,350
County
Dallas County, TX
Resolved
2017

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Overview

On August 24, 2014, a rear-end collision occurred on Texas Avenue in Bryan/College Station, Texas. The plaintiffs, a married couple, were in their vehicle stopped in a line of traffic when it was struck from behind by a pickup truck driven by the defendant. The impact propelled the plaintiffs' vehicle into the car ahead of them. The plaintiffs subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant was negligent by failing to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, follow at a safe distance, and brake or turn to avoid the collision. They also claimed gross negligence, asserting the defendant was using a cell phone at the time of the incident.

The plaintiffs claimed they were stopped at a traffic light that had just turned green when the accident occurred. They reported sustaining neck and back sprains and strains and sought damages for past medical bills, lost earnings, and physical pain, mental anguish, and impairment. The defendant contended that traffic had begun moving at 10 to 15 mph after the light changed when a driver ahead suddenly braked, causing others to brake. The defendant stated he misjudged the distance to the plaintiffs' vehicle and denied gross negligence, arguing his cell phone use was not a distracting factor. The defense also questioned the consistency of one plaintiff's testimony regarding the accident sequence and challenged the causation and severity of the claimed injuries, citing treatment gaps.

The case proceeded to trial, where the jury deliberated for two hours. The jury determined the defendant was negligent but did not find evidence of gross negligence. The court awarded the plaintiffs a total of $2,350. The outcome suggested the jury concluded the defendant acted negligently in causing the collision but rejected the more severe claim of gross negligence. The awarded amount indicated the jury likely assessed the plaintiffs' injury claims to be less extensive than asserted, potentially influenced by the defense's arguments regarding the extent and duration of their injuries.

VerdictlyTM Score

43
/100
Questionable

This outcome differs from typical similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Need better results for your case?

Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$12,637
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.

Dallas County • 2019
View full case
Undisclosed
Verdict-Defense
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.

Dallas County • 2020
View full case
$1,400
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.

Harris County • 2022
View full case
$3,322
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.

Denton County • 2021
View full case
$20,000
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.

Collin County • 2019
View full case