Bastrop County Jury Finds Negligence, No Damages Awarded in Rear-End Crash
One driver stopped at a stop sign and was rear-ended by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed neck and back injuries. The driver of the second vehicle testified she thought the first vehicle was moving forward when she also moved forward. The jury found the second driver negligent but awarded no damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Defense
- Amount
- Undisclosed
- County
- Bastrop County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On July 7, 2016, a driver plaintiff, a domestic-violence counselor, was operating a sedan in Bastrop County with a passenger plaintiff, also a domestic-violence counselor. Their vehicle was stopped at a stop sign when the defendant rear-ended it in a compact sport utility vehicle. The plaintiffs subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant was negligent in operating her vehicle.
The plaintiffs claimed they sustained neck and back injuries, among other complaints, and testified that the driver plaintiff had come to a normal stop before the impact. They also stated the defendant appeared to be holding a cell phone after the collision, suggesting distraction as a cause. Both plaintiffs underwent chiropractic treatment and physical therapy and testified that their injuries impacted their ability to perform daily activities and work. They sought specific damages for past medical expenses, lost wages, physical pain and mental anguish, and physical impairment.
The defendant, who did not attend the trial but whose video deposition was presented, testified that she believed the plaintiffs' vehicle was starting to move forward and denied using a cell phone at the time of the crash. Defense counsel argued the impact was minor and that the plaintiffs exaggerated their injuries. Photographic evidence of minor vehicle damage was presented, and the defense highlighted inconsistencies in the plaintiffs' initial emergency room records regarding some of their reported symptoms. The defense also suggested the driver plaintiff's back issues could stem from normal wear and tear or her part-time work as a concert security guard.
After a five-hour deliberation, the jury found the defendant negligent but awarded no damages to either plaintiff. The outcome suggested the jury agreed with the defense regarding the minor nature of the impact and the extent of the plaintiffs' injuries, despite finding negligence in the defendant's actions.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Bastrop County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.