Austin Jury Awards $2.15 Million in Fatal Truck Crash
A passenger died in a multi-vehicle collision on Highway 183 in Austin. The collision involved two vehicles, one of which was towing a trailer. The impact pushed one vehicle into oncoming traffic, where it was struck by another vehicle. The family of the deceased passenger sued the drivers and their employers, alleging negligence in operation, speed, lookout, and distraction. The defendants argued that while one driver was following too closely, other factors like cell phone use and equipment towing did not contribute to the crash. The jury found one driver and his employer primarily at fault.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $2,150,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Wrongful Death
- Accident Type
- Multi-vehicle
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On October 6, 2014, a multi-vehicle collision occurred on Highway 183 in Austin, resulting in the death of a 30-year-old passenger. The decedent was traveling southbound in a vehicle when it was rear-ended by a truck towing a boom lift. The impact forced the passenger's vehicle into the highway's northbound lanes, where it was struck a second time by another car. The passenger died at the scene.
The decedent's family, including her mother, father, and daughter, subsequently filed a lawsuit. They alleged that the driver of the truck, an employee of Dynamic Industries Inc., was negligent in his operation, including failing to keep a proper lookout, control his speed, and avoid the collision. The family also claimed that the driver was distracted by a cell phone. They asserted that Dynamic Industries Inc. was vicariously liable for its employee's actions and negligent in its training and supervision policies. The driver of the initial passenger vehicle also filed a counterclaim against the truck driver and his employer.
During the trial, the family's accident reconstruction expert testified that the truck driver failed to control his speed, was inattentive, and lacked proper training for towing. The truck driver's employer conceded vicarious liability and that its employee had been following too closely. However, the defendants argued that the employee's hands-free cell phone use and any alleged lack of training regarding heavy equipment hauling did not contribute to the accident. Defense experts supported these contentions, while acknowledging the truck driver's negligence in following too closely.
After a seven-day trial and two days of deliberation, the jury found the truck driver 80 percent negligent and his employer, Dynamic Industries Inc., 20 percent negligent. The jury determined that the driver of the passenger vehicle was not negligent. Due to vicarious liability, Dynamic Industries Inc. was held 100 percent liable for the damages. The jury awarded the decedent's family $2.15 million and awarded the driver of the passenger vehicle $282,000 on his cross-claim.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was traveling on Interstate 10 when his pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. That second pickup truck had been propelled forward after being struck by a tractor-trailer. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed injuries to his back and neck. The case involved multiple defendants and allegations of negligence in vehicle operation and employer liability.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.