Arlington, Texas Jury Awards $3,039 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped at a red light when another driver rear-ended their vehicle. The driver of the first vehicle claimed neck, back, and shoulder injuries. The child in the first vehicle claimed abdominal pain from the seat belt. The first driver sought damages for medical bills, pain, and impairment. The defense argued that the injuries were pre-existing.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $3,039
- County
- Tarrant County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence, Soft Tissue, Abdomen, Chiropractic
Case Overview
In April 2014, a plaintiff and her minor daughter were rear-ended while stopped in traffic on Sublett Road in Arlington, Texas. The defendant’s vehicle struck their 2010 Dodge Charger. The minor plaintiff reported abdominal pain from her seat belt, which resolved quickly. The adult plaintiff claimed neck, back, and right shoulder injuries. The plaintiffs subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant acted negligently by failing to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, or brake adequately. The defendant reportedly admitted to glancing at written directions at the time of the collision.
The adult plaintiff sought damages for past medical bills and for past and future physical pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment for herself, along with past pain and anguish for her daughter. She claimed her shoulder injury was new or an aggravation of a 2012 work-related injury, from which she asserted symptoms had resolved. A chiropractor testified that the adult plaintiff’s treatment was necessary and her injuries were caused by the accident. The defense argued that the adult plaintiff's shoulder issues were pre-existing, stemming from degenerative conditions or the 2012 injury, and questioned the duration of her injuries.
The jury found the defendant negligent. The adult plaintiff was awarded $3,039, consisting of $2,789 for past medical costs and $250 for past physical pain and mental anguish. The jury awarded no damages to the minor plaintiff. The outcome reflected a jury decision that found negligence but awarded significantly less than the plaintiff sought, likely influenced by arguments regarding pre-existing conditions and the short-term nature of the minor's complaints.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Tarrant County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.