Addison Jury Finds Negligence, No Damages Awarded in Collision
One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver attempted to turn left in front of her, causing a collision. The driver who was stopped claimed the other driver turned left in front of her. The driver who was stopped also claimed the other driver was negligent in failing to keep a proper lookout and making an unsafe turn. The other driver claimed the first driver was trying to pass him on the left and clipped his rear corner. The defense argued that weather conditions and the first driver being late for work contributed to the accident.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Defense
- Amount
- Undisclosed
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On October 30, 2013, a collision occurred in Addison, Texas, involving a vehicle driven by the plaintiff, a pharmacy clerk, and a taxicab driven by the defendant. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant, a taxicab driver, attempted a left turn in front of her at an intersection, causing her vehicle to strike his. The plaintiff claimed multiple soft-tissue injuries to her shoulders, knees, back, and neck, and sought approximately $36,000 for past medical expenses, along with damages for pain and impairment. The lawsuit alleged the defendant's negligent driving and, against the taxicab company, negligent training and supervision.
The defendant contended the plaintiff was behind him in the middle lane and attempted to pass him on the left as the light turned green, clipping his vehicle's left rear corner. The defendant maintained he was going straight, not turning, and argued that dark, rainy conditions contributed to the plaintiff misjudging distances. Defense counsel also disputed the severity and causation of the plaintiff's claimed injuries, noting minimal vehicle damage ($1,200 for the plaintiff, $200 for the defendant), no injury complaints at the scene, and suggested the plaintiff's extensive treatment was attorney-directed and excessive. The defense also argued that the cab driver was an independent contractor, absolving the company of training duties.
Following a three-day trial, the jury found both the plaintiff and the defendant 50 percent negligent for the collision. However, the jury awarded no damages to the plaintiff. Under Texas law, a plaintiff found more than 50 percent at fault cannot recover damages, but even with a 50 percent finding, the zero damages award indicated the jury did not attribute compensable injuries or losses to the incident.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their car was hit by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back, neck, and shoulder. The passenger in the car also claimed an injury. The case involved an insurance claim after the at-fault driver was uninsured.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.