$3,499,201 Motor Vehicle Accident Case
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was hit from behind by another driver. The injured driver claimed to have suffered a lumbar herniation and spinal alignment issues. They underwent conservative treatment, including physical therapy and injections, and later a lumbar fusion surgery. The defense argued that the injuries were degenerative and not caused by the accident.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $3,499,201
- County
- Riverside County, CA
- Resolved
- 2023
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was hit from behind by another driver. The injured driver claimed to have suffered a lumbar herniation and spinal alignment issues. They underwent conservative treatment, including physical therapy and injections, and later a lumbar fusion surgery. The defense argued that the injuries were degenerative and not caused by the accident.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Deserve a fair outcome for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Riverside County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
A Washington jury awarded a plaintiff over $33.49 million in a personal injury case on April 9, 2018. The verdict included damages for future lost wages, future medical and life care expenses, and past and future non-economic damages. While details of the incident and specific legal claims were not provided, both sides presented expert testimony. Specialists in accident reconstruction, vehicle design, human factors, injury assessment, and economic projections offered evidence to the jury.
A Washington jury rendered a verdict on April 9, 2018, in a case involving the plaintiff and the defendant. The award to the plaintiff included $709,612 for future lost wages, $15,333,562 for future medical and life care expenses, $2,117,000 in past non-economic damages, and $15,330,000 in future non-economic damages. Both the plaintiff and the defendant presented expert testimony to the jury, covering fields such as accident reconstruction, vehicle design, human factors, life care planning, economics, and medical specialties. Few other details were available regarding the incident or legal claims.
In Washington, a jury awarded the plaintiff a total of $33,490,174. The award included $709,612 for future lost wages or earning capacity, $15,333,562 for future medical and life care expenses, $2,117,000 in past non-economic damages, and $15,330,000 in future non-economic damages. Few details about the incident leading to the lawsuit were available. During the proceedings, both sides presented expert testimony. The plaintiff's experts included specialists in human factors/biomechanics, vehicle design, vehicle handling/dynamics, product safety, accident reconstruction, life care planning, economics, and physiatry/spinal cord injuries. The defendant's experts testified on accident reconstruction, vehicle design, human factors/biomechanics, life care planning, economics, physiatry, and sleep medicine.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit following a motor vehicle accident involving a taxicab, alleging injuries. An orthopedic surgeon provided expert testimony on behalf of the plaintiff. The defense presented testimony from an expert in vehicle accident reconstruction. The case concluded with an award of $391,645.
A motor vehicle accident in Los Angeles County, California, on December 23, 2019, near Interstate 5 northbound and the 118 freeway, led to a lawsuit against the State of California, California Highway Patrol, Lyft, Inc., and other defendants. The plaintiff alleged the defendants negligently operated, controlled, maintained, and entrusted their vehicles, contributing to the incident. The plaintiff claimed severe injuries, experiencing significant physical pain, suffering, and emotional distress that required ongoing medical treatment and caused a loss of earnings and earning capacity. The complaint included causes of action for general negligence, negligence per se, and statutory negligence, alleging violations of the California Vehicle Code and California Government Code sections. The plaintiff sought damages for past and future medical expenses, lost earnings, and other related costs. The lawsuit followed a denied claim submitted by the plaintiff to the defendants on June 5, 2020. Details regarding the case's ultimate resolution were not available in the provided record.